The great debate: online privacy against national security

8:15 PM
The great debate: online privacy against national security -

Online Privacy vs National Security Blog Image

Did you know that 45% of Americans say in online privacy is more important than national security? Read on to learn more about recent developments in one of the liveliest debates of the Internet.

This is one of the greatest moral debates surrounding the web: online privacy versus national security. Where exactly begins the security and privacy end?

With many reports of major violations of cyber security, ways of terrorist groups like ISIS are skillfully using the web, and the introduction of controversial data-sharing government bills like CISA and Bill investigative powers, the issue comes into play more and more. And as it seems, there is no easy answer ...

A press release of the latest edition of the annual confidence index TrusteConsumer found that 92% of Americans are more concerned about their online privacy; 42 percent are more concerned than they were a year ago

If fact, when presented with the statement :. 'the personal privacy online is not as important as national security, '45% disagree.

most of the respondents, 38 percent, were concerned about the possibility of companies sharing data with other companies. About the same percentage said companies being more transparent about how they collect and use data would be one of the best ways to reduce their concerns. Twenty-seven percent said the government passing more laws to protect their personal information may help alleviate their concerns.

Why the increased participation of Privacy Concern online?

As it seems, consumer confidence is a growing concern. And for good reason. After all, the data brokerage industry is a multi-million dollar

In an interview with journalist Steve Kroft on 60 minutes Julie Brill, Federal Trade Commissioner, noted:

"No one even knows how many there are companies our traffic data. But it is certainly in the thousands, and include research firms, all kinds of Internet companies, advertisers, retailers and trade associations. The largest data broker Acxiom, a marketing giant that boasts it has, on average, 1500 items of information on more than 0 million Americans. "

What is worrying is some of that data mining could distribute your information without you even knowing it. Take for example, the latest news from the largest online pharmacy in the UK being sentenced to a $ 0,000 fine for selling personal data patients crooks Pharmacy2U was convicted of illegally selling the names and addresses of more than 21,000 patients without their consent or even notification to its plus. troubling, one of the companies that bought the data included a fraudulent lottery Australian company that deliberately targeted elderly men with chronic health problems.

to compound the worries intentional data sharing, it is involuntary sharing resulting from violations of cyber-attack. Some large corporate data and security breaches have taken place this year, among them:

  • Healthcare Provider BlueCross BlueShield has had two strokes. BlueCross BlueShield Excellus the BlueCross BlueShield and Premera offenses have resulted in potential leaks of name, date of birth, social security number, bank account information, phone numbers and addresses for more than 21.7 million subscribers health.
  • supplier credit service Experian has been targeted by hackers, compromising private data of its customers 15 million T-Mobile . The compromised data included social security numbers, dates of birth and ID number
  • CVS Pharmacy had to withdraw its popular online site photo printing control due to a suspect hack. credit card data, email and postal addresses, phone numbers and passwords were taken. It is not known how many millions were affected.
  • toy manufacturer VTech suffered a frightening infringement, especially as the hack attack affected the privacy of innocent youth. Child profiles leaks (including name, gender and birthday), the sale of newspapers, e-mail, profile pictures and the affected activity logs lose 5 million parents and more than 6 million children .

and of course, there were Ashley Madison infamous attacks, which, for better or for worse, have resulted in the release of 37 million users cheating

the companies take a lot of data, but consumers is understandably are worried if these private and valuable data is adequately protected

Yet new Internet projects that have been introduced, which should ideally provide advanced protection, certainly not assuaged any fears.

The adoption of the CISA bill has been extremely controversial, as we discussed in our blog 10 things to know about Bill CISA . The bill, which, as noted, is "to improve cybersecurity" with "better sharing of information about threats to cybersecurity," essentially encourages the sharing of information on the Internet traffic between private entities and agencies federal government with the hope of preventing cyber attacks on a large scale.

however, it was criticized by many in cyber security and online privacy advocates. They point out that it encourages companies to share data with the government and other companies, rather than encouraging the real heavy lifting necessary to ensure effective protection against cyber attacks

national security :. the Other Side of the Coin

of course, the recent course of events, such as bombings and shootings Paris Terror San Bernardino, reveal that the global reach online terrorist groups like ISIS can not be ignored either.

use of the Internet and social media is increasingly popular among extremists who have successfully used these channels to recruit and radicalize raise funds. As many of us already know, ISIS uses greedily all forms of social media, including YouTube, Twitter, Instagram and Tumblr. One day, the group reached a peak of almost 40,000 tweets in a day as they marched in the Iraqi city of Mosul

Since the highly coordinated attacks in Paris that claimed the lives of 129 innocent people, there were many discussions on the measures that international governments should and will.

attacks highlight the increasing difficulties of Western intelligence agencies feel the track and thwart terrorist attacks as terrorists increase their online presence and are moving to sophisticated communications methods encrypted.

as Yahoo News reported , Nick Rasmussen, the current Director of the NCTC, the National Center against terrorism, told a congressional committee that terrorists have demonstrated an increasing ability to communicate "beyond our reach" and difficulty tracking their land is "more and more over time."

aggressive and sophisticated approach to terrorists to online communication, coupled with new obstacles in the monitoring of their activity, poses a unique challenge for the intelligence agencies of the government.

in response, government authorities sought to establish new legislation, more powerful. the UK investigative powers of the bill, for example, aims to modernize the rules on how authorities can access the communications of people to help combat crime the government, terrorism and other threats to national security.

However, as CISA, this bill has raised significant privacy concerns. For example, it includes new plants require business communications, such as broadband or mobile phone to maintain the value of consumer data communication per year . In the past, under the current law, government agencies could ask companies to start collecting data, but could not access historical information because companies do not keep.

The UK project the investigative powers of law also came under hot water because of its approach to encryption. The bill includes a provision that would require UK companies to hand over encryption key so that the scrambled messages can be decoded and read.

More recently, Apple has taken a position to express their concerns about this, stressing that this could inadvertently create a weakness that others could then exploit, making the data less secure users

As reported by the BBC, the company said: ". a key left under the mat just would not be there for the good guys bad guys find too.."

So what's next?

Overall, the debate between the online privacy and national security does not offer easy answers

As Chris Babel CEO, TRUSTe noted after the publication of their results.

"With the highest number of data breaches recorded in 2014, it is not surprising that the confidentiality and security of online data is a hot topic for Americans and a concern growing. But with terrorist threats frequently reported on the news, it is surprising that so many people consider their most important privacy that the fight against this threat.

"governments trample a fine line between a balance between national security and the rights of consumer privacy;. for companies the stakes are high also in a world of increasingly interconnected, lack of confidence may limit growth and strangle innovation that companies are private data they need to drive sales.

"These results show the magnitude of the impact that 3 out of 4 Americans who are concerned their privacy have changed their online behavior last year which means less data, less clicks and lost sales. The message is simple :. Do not wait for legislation or the next data breach - "act now to get your strategy privacy in order and restore confidence with customers

In the Meanwhile, as an ordinary consumer, there is no need to feel helpless. You can have privacy in your own hands by making prudent and tools to protect your personal information using.

the use of a VPN, for example, provides an additional protective layer over an Internet connection completely secure and private. for more information on how to protect your valuable and personal information online, read our blog about 6 Quick Tips to stop identity theft online

So what are your thoughts on this debate? Where bracket are you you? Reach out to us and join the conversation. We are on Facebook , Twitter and Google+ , and we want to hear your views

.
Shares
Previous
Next Post »
0 Komentar